Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Nest thermostat gets new features and design

7 hrs.

While home?thermostats?aren't exactly the most exciting area of technology, the Nest made a splash last year with its good looks and intuitive interface. Now there's a new Nest with a few design tweaks and new features.

Thermostats, unlike smartphones and other personal gadgets, don't really need to be replaced all the time, so the point isn't to make people update their old device, but to make it possible for more people to buy their first one.

The new Nest is 20 percent thinner and has a snazzy new mirror-finish steel border, which should help picky interior designers square themselves with the idea of a big gadget sticking out of the wall. Nest also?claims its?device is now compatible with 25 percent of low-voltage heating and cooling systems.

It also ships?with a few new?features, which existing Nest owners will be happy to learn will also be coming to their original Nests shortly in a software update.?They've improved the scheduling function, allowing the device to learn when it should be hitting the heat or A/C early, and when it should be shutting them off as soon as you're out the door. It should also work better with some less conventional heating systems and those of you with?radiators.

You can now set it to use Spanish or French as the display language, and the app has been upgraded to support Android tablets. You can use the app to adjust schedules and temperatures, or to track your household's energy usage.

The new Nest keeps the same price as the old one ? $249 ? or you can pick up the original now for $229. There's more information on the new features and compatibility at the blog post announcing the device.

Devin Coldewey is a contributing writer for NBC?News Digital. His personal website is coldewey.cc.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/gadgetbox/nest-thermostat-gets-new-features-design-6240387

the national enquirer marie colvin cm punk cm punk lint buenos aires train crash argentina train crash

Reality: ineffable, but impossible to forsake

For youtube videos, paste embed code directly in the text box

-

Members do not need to provide an address

-

Rate Article

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0 Select Comment Validation Method
Member
Name/URL (Guest)
FaceBook (Guest) Member Commenting:


Authenticate with Facebook before submitting

OR


Make your LabSpaces comments count. Start earning LabSpaces points by becoming a member! Learn more. Please verify that you are human: Register for LabSpaces
Make your LabSpaces comments count. Start earning LabSpaces points by becoming a member! Learn more.

Please authenticate before trying to post a comment.

If you would like to remain anonymous, please enter a new name and link below


Friends

Source: http://www.labspaces.net/124056/Reality__ineffable__but_impossible_to_forsake

time magazine person of the year time magazine person of the year la clippers verizon galaxy nexus verizon galaxy nexus lawrence lessig lawrence lessig

Misconduct Is the Main Cause of Retractions in Life-Sciences Journals

Opaque retraction notices in journals can hide fraud while saving face or avoiding libel charges


Journals Journals with the most retractions attributable to fraud or suspected fraud, as recorded in PubMed. Image: TAO Images Limited / Alamy

  • Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...

    Read More??

By Zo? Corbyn of Nature magazine

Conventional wisdom says that most retractions of papers in scientific journals are triggered by unintentional errors. Not so, according to one of the largest-ever studies of retractions. A survey published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has found that two-thirds of retracted life-sciences papers were stricken from the scientific record because of misconduct such as fraud or suspected fraud ? and that journals sometimes soft-pedal the reason.

The survey examined all 2,047 articles in the PubMed database that had been marked as retracted by 3 May this year. But rather than taking journals? retraction notices at face value, as previous analyses have done, the study used secondary sources to pin down the reasons for retraction if the notices were incomplete or vague. These sources included investigations by the US Office of Research Integrity, and evidence reported by the blog Retraction Watch.

The analysis revealed that fraud or suspected fraud was responsible for 43% of the retractions. Other types of misconduct ? duplicate publication and plagiarism ? accounted for 14% and 10% of retractions, respectively. Only 21% of the papers were retracted because of error (see ?Bad copy?).

Earlier studies had found that the percentage of retractions attributable to error was 1.5?3 times higher. ?The secondary sources give a very different picture,? says Arturo Casadevall, a microbiologist at Yeshiva University in New York, and a co-author of the latest study. ?Retraction notices are often not accurate.?

Elizabeth Wager, a UK-based medical writer and co-author of a previous study that relied on journal retraction notices, isn?t surprised by the finding of hidden misconduct. ?We found many notices that seemed deliberately obscure or vague,? she says, speculating that authors and journals may use opaque retraction notices to save face or avoid libel charges.

The latest study shows a ten-fold increase (to about 0.01%) in the proportion of papers retracted owing to fraud since 1975. Previous analyzes have seen a growing trend in retractions in general, but the latest report sheds new light on the extent to which fraud is responsible. It also found a correlation between journal impact factor and the number of fraud-induced retractions, says Ferric Fang, a microbiologist at the University of Washington in Seattle, who led the study.

Influential journals, including Science, Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Cell, all appear in the top-ten list of publications with retractions because of fraud or suspected fraud (see ?Top ten retractors?). For some journals, including the two topping the table ? The Journal of Biological Chemistry and Anesthesia & Analgesia ? the tally was boosted by multiple retractions from the same few individuals, such as anesthesiologist Joachim Boldt, formerly of the Ludwigshafen Clinical Center in Germany. Indeed, Fang and his colleagues found that 38 research groups with five or more retractions accounted for 44% of articles linked to fraud or suspected fraud.

Whether the overall rise in fraud-induced retractions is the result of an increase in misconduct, or simply down to more scrutiny, is an open question, says Fang. It is also unclear whether the high-impact journals have more retractions for fraud because they are checked more closely, or because they are more likely to attract fraudsters. But Fang thinks that the large rewards for publishing in leading journals ? which can range from winning grants to receiving tenure ? are powerful incentives that could be driving some of the trend. ?We need to look at how we have structured the system, so scientists are not given incentives to [commit fraud] quite as strongly,? he says.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=afeb6e640bf9a21bfb40fa3491d5d852

lemonade diet steve jobs action figure chris jericho rose bowl johnny weir quadrantid meteor shower osu football

Deal of the Day: Samsung 2500mAh Standard Battery for Galaxy Note

Deal of the Day The October 2 ShopAndroid.com Deal of the Day is the Samsung 2500mAh Standard Battery for Galaxy Note. Samsung uses the latest Lithium Ion battery technology giving you the best performance possible. This battery is designed specifically for your Samsung Galaxy Note to deliver the most reliable and long lasting power. Great as spare or replacement!

The Samsung 2500mAh Standard Battery is available for just $19.00, 52% off today only. Backed by our 60-day return policy and fast shipping.

Deal also available in the Canada store

Never miss a deal. Sign up for Daily Deal alerts!



Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/SJ_LqL4E6Fg/story01.htm

the cabin in the woods trace adkins the darkest hour the darkest hour neverland wormwood bcs bowl games

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

PFT: Cardinals 4-0 after OT win vs. Dolphins

Green Bay Packers Rodgers is chased by New Orleans Saints Johnson during their NFL football game in Green BayReuters

Drew Brees and Aaron Rodgers were both outstanding on Sunday at Lambeau Field, but in a back-and-forth game with plenty of twists and turns, it was Rodgers? Packers who ended up on top of Brees? Saints, 28-27.

Brees completed 35 of 54 passes for 446 yards, with three touchdowns and no interceptions, but that wasn?t enough. Although he maneuvered them into range for an apparent go-ahead field goal late in the fourth quarter, the Saints? successful kick was called back on a holding penalty, and when they were backed up the Saints missed.

Rodgers completed 31 of 41 passes for 319 yards, with four touchdowns and one interception, and a short completion on a third down just after the two-minute warning iced the game and gave the Packers the win.

For the second consecutive week, the Packers suffered at the hands of bad officiating. Last week it was the infamous Hail Mary in Seattle that wrongly gave the Seahawks a touchdown and likely led to the end of the NFL?s lockout of its referees. This week there are no replacements to blame, just longtime ref Jeff Triplette and his crew, who botched several calls, including a fumble by Saints kickoff returner Darren Sproles that they wrongly ruled down by contact, and a push-off in the end zone by Saints receiver Marques Colston on a touchdown catch that should have been called back for offensive pass interference.

But this time the bad officiating didn?t cost the Packers the game, and they improved to 2-2. The Saints fought hard, but in the end they lost once again, falling to 0-4.

Source: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/30/cardinals-squeak-past-dolphins-on-jay-feely-field-goal/related

lsu football bcs jay z glory alabama crimson tide barry larkin jay z new song torrie wilson

? about Alpine IVA D300 - DIYMA Car Audio Forum

Buy Car Audio
Buy car stereo, Car audio forum, automotive vbulletin, Sell 12 volt, sub woofer troubleshooting, buy car audio, caraudio, audiophile, sound quality, car audio sq, SPL forum with used car audio for sale or to buy speakers and buy amplifier selling stereo systems online
Car Audio Classifieds
Buy car audio, Sell car audio, Used car stereo equipment classifieds, CACO, 12 volt amplifier & sub woofer lisitngs forum. Used speakers for sale, buy used amps and car speaker for sale.
Car Audio Forum
car audio forum, moble audio, car stereo, wholesale car audio, 12 volt, with, amplifier, amp, subwoofer, sound quality, buy car audio, and sell automotive stereo systems for cars
Sound Deadening
Sound deadening, vibration damper, cld tile, damping mat. Anti vibration pads for automotive insualtion damping, CDL mat, sound damping, noise killer, vibration damper sound deadener

Source: http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/technical-advanced-car-audio-discussion/137189-about-alpine-iva-d300.html

world peace world peace lakers colorectal cancer metta kashi neil diamond orange crush

Sailors await resolution in prostitution scandal

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Six months after members of the U.S. military and the Secret Service were embroiled in a prostitution scandal in Colombia, two Navy sailors have been stripped of their security clearances and pulled off their regular jobs, but they have yet to be charged.

U.S. Southern Command says the investigation surrounding the two sailors is still going on, but a lawyer for one of the sailors says it shouldn't take this long to reach a decision. Charges were read against all the other military members allegedly involved two months ago.

The lawyer is arguing that the sailor, David Hawley, was not around at the time that Secret Service and other members of the U.S. military were supposedly soliciting prostitutes in Cartagena. Instead, Hawley, says he was in a different hotel and is complaining that he is being punished and denied a promotion without ever being charged.

"This is not a complex case that requires months and month of investigation," Hawley's lawyer, Jeremiah Sullivan, told The Associated Press Monday.

Sullivan said that Hawley, a decorated Navy petty officer from Detroit, wants to return to the battlefield and "should not be picking weeds at his command. His immediate chain of command will put him back to work, but are caught up in the political red tape."

Of the dozen military members initially implicated, seven Army soldiers and two Marines received administrative punishments for what was described as misconduct, and one Air Force member was cleared. Three of the soldiers declined the administrative punishments and have requested courts martial, which would give them a public trial to contest the charges.

Col. Greg Julian, spokesman for U.S. Southern Command, said only that the matter is still under investigation.

In a letter to Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sullivan said that Hawley "is unjustifiably suffering the collateral damage from the misconduct of the Secret Service." He said that "despite being a decorated war hero and the fact that he is not facing any criminal charges ... Hawley has been banished to washing windows and picking weeds at his command."

The military would not confirm Monday what Hawley's duties are or where he is.

According to Sullivan, Hawley, an explosive ordnance disposal technician, has deployed to Iraq four times. Sullivan said Hawley's promotion to chief petty officer has been delayed, he's been stripped of his top-secret security clearance and fired from his explosive ordnance disposal job.

The Navy said Hawley, 33, has received three Navy achievement medals, including one with valor, and another combat action ribbon. He enlisted in July 2000.

A dozen U.S. service members were investigated for bringing women, likely prostitutes, to their hotel rooms in Colombia shortly before President Barack Obama arrived in the country for an April summit, according to the military's investigation. The investigator's report described the misconduct as consisting "almost exclusively of patronizing prostitutes and adultery."

The scandal erupted after a public dispute over payment between a U.S. Secret Service agent and a prostitute at a Cartagena hotel spilled over into the hallway of the Hotel Caribe. The Secret Service and the military were in the Colombian coastal resort to prepare for Obama's participation in a Latin American summit. Twelve Secret Service employees were implicated. Of those, eight have been ousted, three were cleared of serious misconduct and at least two employees are fighting to get their jobs back.

U.S. Southern Command, headed by Gen. Douglas Fraser, conducted the investigation into the military members' involvement in the April incident. Officials there had no explanation for why the investigation into the two sailors is taking so long.

The military investigation said that evidence substantiating the wrongdoing in the other cases included hotel log books, security camera video and statements from the prostitutes and military members.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/sailors-await-resolution-prostitution-scandal-213535137.html

masters par 3 contest google augmented reality glasses wonderlic test texas tornado fantasy baseball st louis cardinals jared sullinger